Skip to content | Change text size

Monash University Policy Bank

Assessment in Coursework Programs - Effective as of 15 Feb 2010

Purpose

The purpose of this policy is to define the nature of assessment at Monash for units undertaken as part of a coursework program.

Scope

This policy applies to all units in coursework programs.

Policy Statement

The Monash University Assessment in Coursework Programs policy is informed by research and best practice models within the higher education sector.  There is an expectation that discipline areas will draw on assessment research relevant to their field to underpin how this policy is implemented.

The statements below outline the principles of coursework assessment at Monash.  The processes through which assessment in coursework awards is executed are described in detail in the Unit Assessment Procedures.

Principles of assessment at Monash

1. Assessment must reflect the values of effective learning and teaching identified in Monash University key strategic documents and comply with current legislation, and university policy and procedures on privacy.

2. Assessment must be aligned with desired course and unit outcomes.

3. Assessment practices must be conducted and undertaken ethically and with honesty and integrity by staff and students. While acknowledging cultural variations, tasks must be designed and students educated in ways that promote academic integrity.

4. As unit assessment will contribute to and shape students' learning it must be:

Challenging

Assessment must be intellectually challenging, appropriate to the level of study, relevant, and provide opportunities for students to demonstrate evidence of learning. 

Engaging

Assessment must be structured in such a way that students are motivated to engage in the intellectual, practical, and professional dimensions of the task.

Integrated

Assessment tasks must foster the integration of theory, practice, and salient professional requirements.

Educative

Students' learning must be enhanced through assessment design and feedback. 

5. Grading aspect and parity

Where assessment is:

Criterion referenced,

clear criteria, against which students' work will be assessed, must be provided in the interests of parity across assessors, groups or campuses.

Norm Referenced,

a comparison of students' results across assessors, groups or campuses must occur in the interests of parity.

6. Assessment must be purposeful and the purposes of each assessment must be made clear to students. These purposes include:

  • Assessment for learning (diagnostic and formative),
  • Assessment of learning (summative),
  • Assessment as learning (reflective, self-monitoring, collaborative)

Diagnostic,

tasks must be designed to appraise the knowledge and skills of students.

Formative,

tasks must be designed to help students engage with ideas, skills and practices that they will develop further during the unit or course.

Summative,

tasks must be designed to make overall judgements about students' understandings and performances in relation to the unit and course outcomes.

Reflective/Self monitoring,

tasks will encourage students to reflect on their learning, develop their own learning goals and monitor and improve their own learning approaches and outcomes over time.

Collaborative,

tasks must give students the opportunity to learn from each other.

7. Assessment practices and processes must be continuously monitored for quality assurance and improvement purposes, and must be:

Aligned and credible

Assessment must serve the unit and course objectives or other professional objectives.

Explicit and transparent

The requirements of assessment tasks and the means by which students' work will be judged and overall grades determined must be clearly communicated to students.

Reliable

Assessment tasks must strive to yield consistent and reproducible results

Timely

The scheduling of assessment must provide for the students' learning needs.  Where feedback is provided it must be given in time for students to improve their learning. 

Responsive

Formative and interim-summative feedback must be constructive and supportive of further learning.

Supporting procedures

Unit Assessment Procedures

Supporting guidelines

Responsibility for implementation

Deans, Associate Deans (Education)

Status

New

Key Stakeholders

Students, Teaching Staff, Administrative Staff

Approval body

Name: Academic Board
Meeting: 3/09
Date: 17-June-2009
Agenda item: 15.5

Endorsement body

Name: Education Committee
Meeting: 3/09
Date: 27-May-2009
Agenda item: 4.2.2

Definitions

Related legislation

Statute 6.1.5 Assessment (previously 6.1.5 Examinations)


Assessment Regulations

Related policies

Special Consideration Policy and Procedures


Grading Scale Policy and Procedures


Academic Programs from Multiple Campuses Policy

Related documents

Date Effective

15-February-2010

Review Date

11-July-2010

Owner

Education Committee

Author

EPC Assessment Working Party

Content Enquiries

policy-education@monash.edu

 

University Policy Use

Version Number: 1.0

Contact: adm-PolicyBank@monash.edu

This page viewed Saturday, 25-May-2013 05:09:56 EST